Seeking a female word for ‘virtuoso’

Yesterday we had a meeting of my piano club, a group of adult amateur pianists interested in developing their playing. The subject of ‘virtuosos’ and ‘virtuoso technique’ came up in relation to a piano piece with some fast, technically difficult ‘show-off’ passages. We wondered where the word ‘virtuoso’ comes from and what it really means?

A little research showed that ‘virtuoso’ comes from the Latin word ‘vir’ = a man, and from the word ‘virtuous’ in an old sense of ‘distinguished by manly qualities; full of manly strength.’ Some of us felt that the phrase ‘a female virtuoso’ is therefore unsatisfactory. It seems perverse to describe a woman as a ‘virtuoso’ once you know that the word signified manliness. But women pianists can be every bit as dazzling as men. Perhaps we need a new word to describe them?

There used to be a word ‘virtuosa’, but the OED says it was a specialised word, ‘now rare’, referring to a learned religious woman. Although some modern dictionaries claim the word is available to signify ‘a female virtuoso’, it has never caught on in the world of music.

So if ‘vir’ is the Latin for ‘man’, how about using the Latin word for ‘woman’? It’s ‘mulier’ (today its descendant is found in the Spanish ‘mujer’, a woman). A female equivalent of ‘virtuoso’ might be something like ‘mulierosa’, ‘full of womanly strength’. I tried to imagine using it in a phrase like, ‘the mulierosa pianist Martha Argerich’. ‘Clara Schumann had a mulierous piano technique.’

Hmmm. But is ‘womanly strength’ the female equivalent of ‘manly strength’, or are women’s strengths different? In that case we still need a good word for ‘a woman musician with a dazzling technique’. The search continues.

Liked this post? Subscribe to the RSS feed for more of the same!

This entry was posted on Sunday 12th March 2017 at 3:52pm and is filed under Daily Life, Musings, Teaching. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Seeking a female word for ‘virtuoso’”

  1. Ivan Huke said on

    I am happy to accept that such ladies as Martha Argerich and yourself are ‘virtuosos’. Try to blank out the association with the Latin ‘vir’. If we all worry too much about the origins of words, language will not be the useful, evolving tool that it is. For example, who is bothered by the fact that the word ‘lady’ originally meant a person who made loaves of bread? And when a footballer scores with a ‘clinical’ finish, who is troubled by the thought that ‘clinical’ matters should relate to beds (from the original Greek)?

  2. Susan Tomes said on

    Ivan, what a delightful comment, thank you! I guess my blog post was slightly tongue in cheek, but it’s true that as a woman one does get tired of having to borrow ‘male’ words. It’s nice at any rate to be a pianist rather than a pianistess!

  3. John Goacher said on

    It would certainly never have occurred to me that ‘virtuoso’ referred specifically to a man. Whatever the origin of the word, all current definitions of virtuoso that I can find from a quick google search start with “An individual” or “a person”.

    The modern trend is surely to move away from using gender specific terms. For example, it is increasingly common to refer to females in the acting profession as actors rather than actresses, except in the case of gender specific awards such as “best actress”.

  4. Susan Tomes said on

    John, you’re right. The discussion we had at piano club was light-hearted – basically I agree with you that we should just accept the modern use of ‘virtuoso’ to mean a person of either gender, but it was interesting to think about the etymology!

Leave a Reply